This is always the hardest part of the semester for me. I have to stand back and let them move solo finishing the semester. The classroom, after week 13 has fallen into relative anarchy. Not in a negative sense of the word, just pure individual pursuit of understanding (and a passing grade). It feels reckless, though. It is exhausting, Like 50-60 minilessons rising each day like a hydra from the seats. Formality lets us relax. Ironic, isn’t it.
Student research papers were acceptable, by and large, in 093. Scattered sentence level errors prevail, mostly in complex sentences beginning in a sub. conj. More activities and quizlets need to be incorporated. This also will have some use in ENGL083 toward the beginning of the semester. There has always been a gap between the vocab and the paragraph chapters. It assumes to much. It assumes that students who are tagged with reading deficits know and understand the flavors that words come in, and how helpers connect these words into single and double idea components.
The CONNECT program is showing its limits in ENGL083. Its longitudinal nature makes it difficult to factor into a traditional grade. Students show modest to little improvement. There is also an end-of-semester bottleneck in the self-pacing unit of the program. It will delay students from proceeding further once a set point for the day or even week is reached.
Finally, the ethical dilemma of ACCUPLACER credit and the negative gain correlation (r=-1) on attendance needs to be addressed. Is it ethical to grant access to a passing grade if attendance requirements are not met? Is it ethical to require a student who has successfully reached the program level the burden of attending a class she does not need. Can some middle ground be found? Currently, students who surpass the program level score must be in contact with me at least once a week. Most of the conversations are about other classes, such as MATH or ECON. Others are about college administration procedures, like course registration or financial aid. Finally, some are purely social and focus on mentoring. Will this pass muster in under scrutiny or is it too liberal of a compromise?